Improved outcomes from transradial over transfemoral access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and upstream use of tirofiban / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Transradial access has been increasingly used during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in last decade. Clinical benefits of upstream use of tirfiban therapy in STEMI patients treated by primary PCI have been reported. We investigated the merits of transradial vs. transfemoral access in primary PCI for STEMI patients with upstream use of tirofiban.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Patients with STEMI treated with tirofiban between December 2006 and October 2012 then by primary PCI were compared between transradial (n = 298) and transfemoral (n = 314) access. Baseline demographics, angiographic and PCI features and primary endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30-day clinical follow-up were recorded.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Baseline and procedural characteristics were comparable between the two groups, apart from more patients in transradial group had hypertension and were treated by thrombus aspiration during primary PCI. Significantly fewer MACE occurred in the transradial group (5.4%) compared with the transfemoral group (9.9%) at 30-day clinical follow-up. Major bleeding events at 30-day clinical follow-up were 0 in transradial group and in 2.9% of transfemoral group. Multivariate analysis confirmed transradial approach as an independent negative predictor of 30-day MACE (HR 0.68; 95%CI 0.35 - 0.91; P = 0.03).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Using transradial approach in primary PCI for acute STEMI infarction patients treated with tirofiban was clearly beneficial in reducing bleeding complications and improving 30-day clinical outcomes.</p>

Randomized comparison of intracoronary tirofiban versus urokinase as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the ICTUS-AMI trial / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>No randomized trial has been performed to compare the efficacy of an intracoronary bolus of tirofiban versus urokinase during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We investigated whether the effects of adjunctive therapy with an intracoronary bolus of urokinase was noninferior to the effects of an intracoronary bolus of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PCI.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 490 patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary PCI were randomized to an intracoronary bolus of tirofiban (10 µg/kg; n = 247) or urokinase (250 kU/20 ml; n = 243). Serum levels of P-selectin, von Willebrand factor (vWF), CD40 ligand (CD40L), and serum amyloid A (SAA) in the coronary sinus were measured before and after intracoronary drug administration. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete ( ≥ 70%) ST-segment resolution (STR) at 90 minutes after intervention, and the noninferiority margin was set to 15%.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In the intention-to-treat analysis, complete STR was achieved in 54.4% of patients treated with an intracoronary bolus of urokinase and in 60.6% of those treated with an intracoronary bolus of tirofiban (adjusted difference: -7.0%; 95% confidence interval: -15.7% to 1.8%). The corrected TIMI frame count of the infarct-related artery was lower, left ventricular ejection fraction was higher, and the 6-month major adverse cardiac event-free survival tended to be better in the intracoronary tirofiban group. An intracoronary bolus of tirofiban resulted in lower levels of P-selectin, vWF, CD40L, and SAA in the coronary sinus compared with an intracoronary bolus of urokinase after primary PCI (P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>An intracoronary bolus of urokinase as an adjunct to primary PCI for acute STEMI is not equally effective to an intracoronary bolus of tirofiban with respect to improvement in myocardial reperfusion assessed by STR. This may be caused by less reduction in coronary circulatory platelet activation and inflammation.</p>

Impact of angina prior to acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction on short-term outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the Shanghai Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome (SRACE) / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>The clinical significance of ischemic chest pain before acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains an interesting issue of investigation particularly in the era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to assess the impact of angina prior to STEMI on short-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary PCI.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Among a total of 875 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, 292 had episodes of angina within 24 hours of STEMI (PA group) and the remaining 583 were free of anginal symptoms (non-PA group). Clinical characteristics, angiographic and procedural features, and in-hospital and 30-day outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Diabetes was less common (17.5% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.04) and symptom-to-door time was shortened ((191.6 ± 96.8) minutes vs. (357.2 ± 341.9) minutes, P < 0.001) in the PA group than in the non-PA group. Patients with angina prior to STEMI had fewer totally or nearly totally occluded infarct-related artery (TIMI flow grade 0 - 1) at initial angiography (75.0% vs. 90.7%, P < 0.001), and achieved more TIMI flow grade 3 after primary PCI (84.2% vs. 78.2%, P = 0.04). These were associated with higher rates of overall procedural success (95.9% vs. 91.8%, P = 0.02) and of complete ST-segment resolution at 90 minutes after the procedure (51.7% vs. 40.3%, P = 0.001). During a 30-day clinical follow-up, the left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly improved ((53.0 ± 8.6)% vs. (51.1 ± 9.7)%, P = 0.002) and the primary endpoint of major adverse cardiac events was reduced in the PA group (7.2% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.01).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Presence of angina prior to acute STEMI is associated with better outcome at a 30-day clinical follow-up in patients undergoing primary PCI.</p>

Outcomes after primary coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Drug-eluting stent (DES) has been used widely for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome with or without diabetes mellitus during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but its long-term safety and efficacy in diabetic patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after primary coronary intervention with DES implantation for diabetic patients with acute STEMI, compared with non-diabetic counterparts.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From December 2004 to March 2006, 56 consecutive diabetic patients (diabetic group) and 170 non-diabetic patients (non-diabetic group) with acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI with DES implantation in 3 hospitals were enrolled. Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, as well as occurrence of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) including cardiac death, non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) during hospitalization and one-year clinical follow-up were compared between the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Patients in diabetic group were more hyperlipidemic (69.6% and 51.8%, P = 0.03) and had longer time delay from symptom onset to admission ((364 +/- 219) minutes and (309 +/- 223) minutes, P = 0.02) than those in non-diabetic group. The culprit vessel distribution, reference vessel diameter, and baseline TIMI flow grade were similar between the two groups, but multi-vessel disease was more common in diabetic than in non-diabetic group (82.1% and 51.2%, P < 0.001). Despite similar TIMI flow grades between the two groups after stenting, the occurrence of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) = 2 was lower in diabetic group (75.0% vs 88.8% in non-diabetic groups, P = 0.02). The MACE rate was similar during hospitalization between the two groups (5.4% vs 3.5%, P = 0.72), but it was significantly higher in diabetic group (16.1%) during one-year follow-up, as compared with non-diabetic group (6.5%, P = 0.03). The cumulative one-year MACE-free survival rate was significantly lower in diabetic than in non-diabetic group (78.6% vs 90.0%, P = 0.02). Angiographic stent thrombosis occurred in 5.4% and 1.2% of the patients in diabetic and non-diabetic group, respectively (P = 0.19). All of these patients experienced non-fatal myocardial infarction.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Although the early clinical outcomes were similar in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute STEMI treated with DES implantation, the cumulative MACE-free survival at one-year follow-up was worse in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients. More effective diabetes-related managements may further improve the clinical outcomes of diabetic cohort suffering STEMI.</p>

The impact of expansion of sirolimus eluting stent on intimal hyperplasia: an intravascular ultrasound study / 中华心血管病杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the impact of expansion grade of sirolimus eluting stent on intimal hyperplasia with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 75 patients implanted with sirolimus eluting stents for at least 8 months were enrolled in this study and IVUS could be performed in 76 stents of 73 patients and 2 patients were excluded due to total coronary occlusion. External elastic membrane (EEM) cross-sectional areas (CSA) at stent inlet and outlet, at in-stent minimal CSA; in-stent CSA, cavity CSA, intimal area (in-stent area-cavity area), maximal and minimal diameter of stent, and symmetry index of stent (minimal diameter of stent/maximal diameter of stent) were measured.</p><p><b>RESULT</b>Five out of 76 stents of 73 patients developed intimal hyperplasia and intimal proliferation was inhibited by sirolimus eluting stent in patients with either minimal stent CSA/EEM CSA < 0.5 (n = 56) or >or= 0.5 (n = 20), minimal stent CSA/reference CSA < 0.9 (n = 44) or >or= 0.9 (n = 32), minimal stent CSA < 5 mm(2) (n = 25) or CSA >or= 5 mm(2) (n = 51), symmetry index of stent at minimal CSA of stent < 0.9 (n = 37) or >or= 0.9 (n = 39) during IVUS follow up.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Sirolimus eluting stent inhibited intimal hyperplasia independent of stent expansion grade.</p>

Outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients aged over 75 years / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>The optimal reperfusion strategy in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, in-hospital and one-year clinical outcomes for patients > 75 years of age with STEMI receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), compared with those treated by conservative approach.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and two patients > 75 years of age with STEMI presented < 12 hours were randomly allocated to primary PCI (n = 50) or conservative therapy only (n = 52). The baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcome and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization at one-year clinical follow-up were compared between the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Age, gender distribution, risk factors for coronary artery disease, infarct site and clinical functional status were similar between the two groups, but the patients in primary PCI group received less low-molecular-weight heparin during hospitalization. Compared with conservative group, the patients in primary PCI group had significantly lower occurrence rate of re-infarction and death and shortened hospital stay. The composite endpoint for in-hospital survivals at 30-day follow-up was similar between the two groups, but one-year MACE rate was significantly lower in the primary PCI group (21.3% and 45.2%, P = 0.029). Left ventricular ejection fraction was not significantly changed in both groups during follow-up. Multivariate analysis revealed that primary PCI (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21 - 0.69, P = 0.03) improved MACE-free survival rate for STEMI patients aged > 75 years.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our results indicated that primary PCI was safe and effective in reducing in-hospital mortality and one-year MACE rate for elderly patients with STEMI.</p>

Long term clinical outcomes in patients with moderate renal insufficiency undergoing stent based percutaneous coronary intervention / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Patients with end-stage renal disease have a high mortality from coronary artery disease, but the impact of moderate renal insufficiency on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the effect of drug-eluting stent implantation in these patients remain unclear. This study determined the long-term effect of moderate renal insufficiency on death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after stent based PCI and examined whether drug-eluting stent implantation could favourably influence clinical outcome.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Major adverse cardiac events and causes of mortality were determined for 1012 patients undergoing percutaneous intervention from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2004 at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital. Based on estimated creatinine clearance levels, long term outcomes were compared between patients with estimated creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min (renal insufficiency group; n = 410) and those with estimated creatinine clearance > or = 60 ml/min (control group; n = 602). Subgroup analysis was also made for patients with renal insufficiency between drug eluting stent (n = 264) and bare metal stent implantation (n = 146) during PCI.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>During follow-up (average 17 months) after successful PCI, all causes of death (7.1% vs 2.3%, P < 0.01) and cardiac death (3.4% vs 1.0%, all P < 0.01) were significantly higher in renal insufficiency group than in control group. For patients with moderate renal insufficiency, drug-eluting stent implantation reduced significantly all causes of death (5.3% vs 10.9%, P < 0.05) and occurrence of major cardiac adverse events (15.1% vs 24.6%, P < 0.05) compared with bare metal stents.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Moderate renal insufficiency is an important clinical factor influencing the mortality after PCI in patients with coronary artery disease and the use of drug-eluting stents should be the preferred therapy for the improvement of long-term outcomes in such patients.</p>